| Week |
Monday |
Wednesday |
1
9/3 |
|
Introduction: Group Project: Hiawatha Line B/C Analysis ex-post. Evaluation, B/C Analysis, Deconstructing a Benefit Cost Analysis
Notes: Evaluation
Original Hiawatha B/C Analysis [Spreadsheet] |
|
|
| 2 9/8 |
Economic Actors as Agents |
Measuring Preferences, Establishing Values (Nebiyou Tilahun, guest lecture) |
|
- Tilahun, Nebiyou Jonas, and David Levinson (2006) A Moment of Time: Reliability in Route Choice using Stated Preference Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Tilahun, Nebiyou Yonas, David M. Levinson, and Kevin J. Krizek (2007) Trails, Lanes, or Traffic: Value of Different Bicycle Facilities Using Adaptive Stated-Preference Survey Transportation Research: A Policy and Practice 41 (4) 287-301
- Levinson, David, Kathleen Harder, John Bloomfield, and Kasia Winiarczyk. (2004) Weighting Waiting: Evaluating the Perception of In-Vehicle Travel Time Under Moving and Stopped Conditions Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board #1898 pp. 61-68
|
| 3 9/15 |
Demand |
Demand 2 |
- EUT 1: Demand
- ETEP 2: The Demand for Transportation: Models and Applications
- NINA COTOLUPENCO presents Savage, Joseph (1997) Simplified Approaches to Ferry Travel Demand Forecasting. Transportation Research Record. 1608 pp. 17-29
|
- McFadden, Daniel (2000) Disaggregate Behavioral Travel Demand's RUM Side: A 30-Year Retrospective (PDF) at the International Association for Travel Behavior (IATB) Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, July 2-7, 2000.
- McFadden, Daniel (1974) The Measurement of Urban Travel Demand, Journal Of Public Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, 303-328, 1974.
- ANUPAM SRIVASTA presents Small, Kenneth (1982) The Scheduling of Consumer Activities: Work Trips. American Economic Review 72(3) 467-479.
|
| 4 9/22 |
Supply 1 |
Supply 2
|
- EUT 2: Costs
- ETEP 3: Learning about Transport Costs
- SHU HONG presents Currie, Graham (2005) The Demand Performance of
Bus Rapid Transit. Journal of Public Transportation 8(1) 41-55
|
|
| 5 9/29 |
Costs 1 |
Costs 2 |
|
- Levinson, David, and David Gillen (1997) The Full Cost of Intercity Highway Transportation. Transportation Research -D 3:4 207-223.
- MARI HUNTER presents Elgar, Ilan; Kennedy, Christopher (2005) Review of Optimal Transit Subsidies: Comparison between Models. ASCE Journal of Urban Planning & Development, Jun2005, Vol. 131 Issue 2, p71-78
|
| 6 10/6 |
Negative Externalities |
Positive Externalities |
| |
- ETEP 13: Accessibility and Economic Opportunity
- Canning, David and Bennathan, Esra,The Social Rate of Return on Infrastructure Investments (July 2000). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2390.
- Weisbrod, Glen and Frederick Treyz (1998) Productivity and Accessibility: Bridging Project Specific and Macroeconomic Analyses of Transportation Investments Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol 1, No. 3 p 65-80
Blum, Ulrich (1998) Positive Externalities and the Public Provision of Transportation Infrastructure: An Evolutionary Perspective Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol 1, No. 3 p. 81-89.
- WILLIAM MELAND presents: O'Kelly, Morton (1986) The Location of Interacting Hub Facilities, Transportation Science 20(2) pp 92-106
|
| 7 10/13 |
Pricing and Fares |
Revenue and Financing (Jerry Zhao Guest Lecture) |
|
|
|
8
10/20 |
Industrial Organization: Ownership |
Industrial Organization: Regulation (Gerard McCullough Guest Lecture)
|
|
|
- Ivaldi and McCullough Subadditivity Tests for Network Separation with an Application to U.S. RailroadsÓ in the Review of Network Economics Vol. 7, Issue 1-March 2008, pp 159-171
- ETEP: 8: Fuel Economy and Auto Safety Regulation: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease
- ETEP: 9: Technology-Forcing Public Policies and the Automobile
- ETEP 14: Regulatory Reform of US Intercity Transportation
- ETEP 15: Regulation and Innovation: Lessons from the American Railroad Industry
- ETEP 16: The Economics of Commercial Transportation Safety
|
| 9
10/27 |
B/C Analysis Results Group Project Due |
Midterm |
| (Present group projects) |
|
| 10
11/3 |
Introduction: Transportation as an Economic System |
|
| Term Paper Topic Due |
EUT 4: Investment |
| 11 11/10 |
Network Growth Model |
Network Growth Model |
- Economides, Nicholas (1996) The Economics of Networks - International Journal of Industrial Organization
- ARTHUR HUANG presents Vogel, Jonathan (2008) Spatial Competition with Heterogeneous Firms. Journal of Political Economy 116(3) pp. 423-466.
|
|
| 12 11/17 |
Competition & Concentration: The Network as Supply Chain |
Land Use Models, Agent-based Land Use Models, (Shanjiang Zhu, Guest Lecture) |
- ETEP 11: The Urban Transportation Problem: A Reexamination and Update
- ETEP 12: Transportation and Land Use
- Wilson, A.G. (1998) Land-use/transport Interaction Models: Past and Future. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. January 1998, Volume 32, Part 1, Pages 3-26
- HOANG TON presents Hess, Daniel Baldwin and Almeida, Tangerine Maria (2007) Impact of Proximity to Light Rail Rapid Transit on Station-area Property Values in Buffalo, New York. Urban Studies 44(5) 1041-1068
|
|
| 13 11/24 |
Agent-based Travel Demand Models (Pavithra Parthasarthi, guest lecture) |
Value Capture (Michael Iacono, Guest Lecture) |
- KYLE HOEGH presents Cullinane, Kevin Song, Dong-Wook, ÒPort privatization policy and practice.Ó Transport Reviews. Jan2002, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p55-75, 21p.
.
|
|
| 14 12/1 |
Evaluation Reconsidered, Illities, Conclusions |
Term Paper Presentations Paper Due |
|
|
| 15 12/8 |
Term Paper Presentations |
Final Examination |
|
|
Texts
Required
Policies
Students are advised to see: Regents Policy: Student Conduct Code regarding policies on academic conduct.
Fall, 2000
To: Students in the Institute of Technology
From: Peter Hudleston, Associate Dean
The purpose of this letter is to call your attention to the issue of scholastic
dishonesty, so that you can avoid any problems during your studies at the
University of Minnesota. The basic statement on this issue appears in the
Undergraduate Catalog (p. 262) and in the back of the IT Student Guide: The
Institute of Technology expects the highest standards of honesty and integrity
in the academic performance of its students. Any act of scholastic dishonesty
is regarded as a serious offense, which may result in expulsion. The Institute
of Technology defines scholastic dishonesty as
submission of false records of academic achievement; cheating on assignments
or examinations; plagiarizing; altering, forging, or misusing an academic
record; taking, acquiring, or using test materials without faculty permission;
acting alone or in cooperation with another to obtain dishonestly grades,
honors, awards, or professional endorsement. Aiding and abetting an act of
scholastic dishonesty is also considered a serious offense.
The questions below are often asked by students who seek interpretation of
this policy.
- What is cheating? Cheating is the violation of rules under
which an examination is given or homework is assigned. This includes submitting
an examination, an essay, a report, or a computer program that is not your
own.
- Does this mean that I can never study with another student?
No. We encourage students to study together, and in the workplace you will
often work as part of a team. The key issue is whether you are being evaluated
as an individual on the basis of the work you hand in. Your instructor should
make it clear when team work is expected and when you should work alone.
If you are not sure, ask!
- What is plagiarism? An excellent definition of plagiarism
is from the Modern Language Association: "In short, to plagiarize is
to give the impression that you have written or thought something that you
have in fact borrowed from another." W. S. Achtert and J. Gibaldi,
The MLA Style Manual, New York, Modern Language Association of America,
1985, p. 4.
- When should I cite sources? There are two issues here. The
first is to avoid plagiarism. The second is to make sure that the reader
can follow your line of thought, verify the information that you have used,
or explore the issue further. Some things are known so widely that they
do not need citing: for example, the definition of momentum or solving a
linear differential equation with constant coefficients. On the other hand,
if you are writing for an audience who might not know how to solve a linear
differential equation with constant coefficients, you might want to give
a citation so that they could find out how. If you find the solution to
a homework problem in a text or journal article, you should give a citation.
If you are allowed to utilize previously written computer code, published
or unpublished, within your own code, you should clearly identify such code
and cite the source.